 |
|
|
Re: SOX as part of a managed hybrid audit program?
Posted:
Nov 22, 2008 11:45 AM
|
|
In my internal auditing course, I mention Section 404 SOX control audits. In SOX design, there should be a process flow, an evaluation of risks, and controls to prevent a risk from happening. The risk is that of a material error in a financial statement.
Some common types of controls include segregation of duties and authorization procedures. I like internal auditors to be aware of these issues, because they might encounter them in the course of a quality audit. For example, an auditor might pull a sample of records to check for a characteristic and realize that the same person had two separate roles in a transaction. If this could affect, say, inventory balance, it may be an example of a control violation. Usually, the quality auditor isn’t in a position to know if this is a violation, but has, in my opinion, a professional obligation to report the potential problem.
One would like to think the process flows designed to identify financial risks and establish control points would have a lot in common with process flows for production or quality control activities. In particular, some of the financial controls and quality controls could be the same. For example, if a company performs a receiving operation and checks quantity and/or quality of received goods, the same check may be a control point for both quality and finance.
I see a high potential for commonality of control testing in hybrid audits. The interpretation of a control failure, however, will probably need to go to an expert. A minor finding in a quality sense may point out a material risk in the financial sense.
One area of interest in a hybrid audit program is record retention. It appears the record retention period for SOX related audit and work papers is seven years from the date the report is issued. I suspect that many companies have a shorter record retention period for quality audit material.
Regards, Dan
|
|
|